I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Drizzle over Prisma(Opus 4.6; Sonnet picks Prisma)
，这一点在safew官方下载中也有详细论述
Раскрыты подробности похищения ребенка в Смоленске09:27
BBC事實查核在2024美國大選前，也調查了關於非法移民投票的相關指控，研究再次顯示此類案例非常罕見。
，这一点在Line官方版本下载中也有详细论述
В прошлые годы Россия использовала танкеры среднего размера для поставок в Индию. Однако из-за более длинного маршрута собранного флота уже не хватает, поэтому для сохранения объемов партии российской нефти в Красном море перегружаются на более крупные суда.
The defence ministry later confirmed its C-130 Hercules was involved and that it had been transporting banknotes to the Central Bank of Bolivia. There were eight people aboard the plane, the air force commander said.，更多细节参见im钱包官方下载